|
||||||
| ||||||
Oaseo BlogSunday, November 19, 2006 Many SEO Firms Not 'Walking The Walk' on Recruitment Advertising
The following employment ad appeared in my local Cleveland newspaper today:
![]() Now, I have nothing against an employer using the newspaper as long as they're tracking the return on investment. I do, however, question an SEO firm using print, while missing the boat on exactly what keeps them in business. Here's what I mean: Fathom SEO fails to use pay-per-click advertising in their recruitment efforts. A search on Google for "cleveland seo jobs" gives me nothing promoting jobs at Fathom, who could most likely always use a steady stream of potential SEO talent in Cleveland, their headquarters. Organically, Fathom SEO has a page dedicated to openings, but guess what? The term "jobs" isn't anywhere on the page. Even the title tag fails to be unique to employment. As a result, they obviously fail to rank competitively against the competition. Lastly, the reply mechanism on the print ad is an e-mail address that looks pretty generic. Careers@fathomseo.com? Do they know responses coming to that address are from this newspaper ad? Shouldn't they use something like newspaperad@fathomseo.com? When a hospital fails to utilize search engines for employment effectively, it's forgivable. When an SEO firm fails to utilize search while dumping big bucks in print, not so much. ArchivesAugust 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 |
| ||||||||
|